Rethinking Transition through Temporalities: Discursive Alternatives for Crafting Sustainable Futures

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15373790

Resumen

Time is a contested terrain where visions of the future collide, unfold, and reconfigure. Its significance becomes even more pronounced in moments of so-called ‘transition,’ where competing paradigms seek to shape the direction of socio-environmental pathways. This article unravels the temporal dimensions of Sustainable Development, Green Transition, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir/Sumak Kawsay, revealing the tensions between linear, progress-driven narratives and decelerative, cyclical, and relational conceptions of time. Particularly, this article explores how Indigenous ethical-philosophical principles - such as Kawsak Sacha, Tinkuy, and Tukuna - invite a reconceptualization of socio-environmental justice that transcend the linear extractivist logics of modernity. Drawing from post-development and decolonial theory, this article argues that a pluriversal transformation, which acknowledges multiple temporalities, is crucial for fostering a more socially and ecologically just future. This transformation calls for a profound re-engagement with the rhythms of nature and regenerative cycles that sustain life, positioning time itself as a site of struggle and Indigenous knowledge as a critical source for reimagining sustainable futures.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Natalie Laprevote, Universidad de Södertörn

    Is a socio-ethnologist and M.Sc. candidate in Environmental studies at the Department of Environment, Development and Sustainability studies, Södertörn University, Stockholm. Her special research interests include pathways towards civilizational transformation, socio-environmental justice and activism, and how human values and worldviews affect the relationship with nature.

  • Bartira S. Fortes, Universidad de Södertörn

    Is an anthropologist, performance artist, and Ph.D. candidate in Environmental studies at the Department of Environment, Development and Sustainability studies, Södertörn University, Stockholm. She investigates Indigenous territoriality in Latin America, particularly Brazil, and examines how Indigenous communities navigate and respond to global challenges such as climate change, environmental governance, and socioenvironmental justice. Her academic background can be found in the conjuncture of Humanities and Social Sciences, intersecting environmental science, global development studies, social anthropology, performing arts and media. Her research interests include themes of Indigenous peoples’ participation in global politics, Indigenous media and art, digital activism, co-creation, and counter-colonization, with a particular emphasis on how transformations in Indigenous territoriality unfold in response to contemporary challenges. 

  • Rickard Lalander, Universidad de Södertörn

    Is a sociologist and political scientist; Full Professor in global development studies/environmental science at Södertörn University; PhD. (2004) and Associate Professor (2009) in Latin American Studies, University of Helsinki. At Södertörn University he teaches and supervises in development and environmental studies at all academic levels, for instance, in the fields of world politics, critical development theory and socio-environmental governance. He collaborates since many years with academic institutions in South America, such as the Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia, and the Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito, and Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, both in Ecuador. In recent years, he has particularly carried out research activities on and with Indigenous peoples, organizations and communities, amidst political mobilization, livelihood alterations, and local alternatives in the face of global capitalism and the impacts of extractivist projects in Indigenous territories in Bolivia and Ecuador. 

    References

    1. Acosta, A. & Martínez, E. (2009). El buen vivir: una vía para el desarrollo. Editorial Abya-Yala.
    2. Altmann, P. (2017). Sumak Kawsay as an Element of Local Decolonization in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review. 52. 749-759. http://doi.org/10.25222/larr.242
    3. Altmann, P. (2020). The commons as colonization: the well-intentioned appropriation of Buen-vivir. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 39(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12941
    4. American Anthropological Association (n.d.). Anthropological Ethics. https://americananthro.org/about/anthropological-ethics/
    5. Beling, A.E., Cubillo-Guevara, A.P., Vanhulst, J. & Hidalgo-Capitán, A.L. (2021). Buen-vivir (Good Living). A “Glocal” Genealogy of a Latin American Utopia for the world, Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211009242
    6. Beling, A.E., Vanhulst, J., Demaria, F., Rabi, V., Carballo, A.E. & Pelenc, J. (2018). Discursive synergies for a ‘Great Transformation’ towards sustainability: pragmatic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, degrowth, and Buen-vivir. Ecological Economics, 144, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025
    7. Bengtsson, J. (2019). Sumak Kawsay and Clashing Ontologies in the Ecuadorian Struggle towards De-coloniality: Progressive mobilization, romanticized constitutional reforms and local conceptions of Sumak Kawsay / Alli Kawsay in Ecuador. M.Sc. Thesis in Environmental Science: Environment, Communication and Politics. Södertörn University.
    8. Bowen, A. & Hepburn, C. (2014). Green Growth: An Assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 407–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43664656
    9. Carter, N. (2018). Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge University Press.
    10. Chuji, M., Rengifo, G. & Gudynas, E. (2019). Buen-vivir. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, A. Demaria & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse – A Post-Development Dictionary ( 111-114). Tulika books.
    11. Coello, G. (2020). Kichwa stories of future(s): Narratives for otherwise good living. In L. López López & G. Coello (Eds.), Indigenous futures and learnings taking place (pp. 37-55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019299
    12. Cuestas-Caza, J. (2018). Sumak Kawsay is not Buen Vivir. Alternautas, 5. 51-66. https://doi.org/10.31273/alternautas.v5i1.1070
    13. Cuestas-Caza, J., Lalander, R. & Lembke, M. (2020). Andean intercultural ecosocialism in times of Buen-Vivir?: A red-green-culturalist approach. In R. Latham, A. T. Kingsmith, J. von Bargen, & N. Block (Eds.), Challenging the Right, Augmenting the Left: Recasting Leftist Imagination (pp. 169-181). Fernwood Publishing.
    14. D'Alisa, G., Deriu, M., & Demaria, F. (2015). Care. In G. D'Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 90–93). Routledge.
    15. Demaria, F., Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A. & Acosta, A. (2023). Post-development: From the Critique of Development to a Pluriverse of Alternatives. In S Villamayor-Tomas & R. Muradian (Eds.), The Barcelona School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology: A Companion in Honour of Joan Martinez-Alier (pp. 59-69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22566-6_6
    16. Demaria, F., & Latouche, S. (2019). Degrowth. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (pp. 148–151). Tulika Books.
    17. Díaz, C.A.B., & Gualinga, P. (2023). “The Forest is a Living, Conscious Being”: As green capitalists rush to cash in on false climate solutions, an Indigenous community in Ecuador pushes back with a groundbreaking model for protecting the Amazon. NACLA Report on the Americas, 55(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2023.2213092
    18. Dietz, K. (2024). Global Energy Transitions and Green Extractivism. In M. Lang, M.A. Manahan, & B. Bringel (Eds.), The Geopolitics of Green Colonialism: Global Justice and Ecosocial Transitions (pp. 27–39). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12865310.6
    19. Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198294956.003.0003
    20. Dryzek, J. (2013). The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press.
    21. Dussel, E.D. (2012). Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Liberation. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/T413012881
    22. Escobar, A. (1984). Discourse and power in development: Michel Foucault and the relevance of his work to the third world. Alternatives X, 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437548401000304
    23. Escobar, A. (1995a). Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
    24. Escobar, A. (1995b). El desarrollo sostenible: Diálogo de discursos. Ecología Política - Cuadernos de debate internacional, 9, 7-25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20742816
    25. Escobar, A. (2011). Sustainability: Design for the Pluriverse. Development, 54(2): 137–140. http://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.28
    26. Escobar, A. (2015). Degrowth, Post-Development, and Transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5
    27. Escobar, A. (2016). Sentipensar con la Tierra: Las luchas territoriales y la dimensión ontológica de las epistemologías del sur. AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102
    28. Escobar, A. (2018a). Transition Discourses and the Politics of Relationality: Toward Designs for the Pluriverse. In B. Reiter (Ed.), Constructing the Pluriverse: The Geopolitics of Knowledge (pp. 80-106). Duke University Press.
    29. Escobar, A. (2018b). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
    30. Escobar, A. (2019). Civilizational transitions. In: A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse – A Post-Development Dictionary (pp. 121-124). Tulika books.
    31. Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.
    32. Escobar, A. (2021). Reframing civilization(s): from critique to transitions. Globalizations, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.2002673
    33. Estermann, J. (2013). Ecosofía andina: La ‘Naturaleza’ en Occidente y en los Andes. FAIA: Revista Filosofía Afro-Indo-Abiyalens, 2(11).
    34. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2019). Integrating forests and water to combat climate change. https://www.fao.org/in-action/forest-and-water-programme/news/news-detail/en/c/1190278/
    35. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans). Pantheon Books.
    36. Foucault, M. (1980). Power / knowledge. Random house.
    37. Fricke, S.N. (2019). Introduction: Indigenous Futurisms in the hyperpresent now. World Art, 9(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2019.1627674
    38. Garcia-Arias, J. & Cuestas-Caza, J. (2024). Pluriversal Autonomies Beyond Development: Towards an Intercultural, Decolonial and Ecological Buen Vivir as an Alternative to the 2030 Agenda in Abya Yala/Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 51(4), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X241292327
    39. García Ruales, J. (2024). Forest moralities, kindred knowledge and Sacha Runakuna: Kawsak Sacha as law. The International Journal of Human Rights, online first version. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2362837
    40. Gergan, M., Smith, S. & Vasudevan, P. (2020). Earth beyond repair: Race and apocalypse in collective imagination. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(1), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818756079
    41. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.
    42. Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2019). Sustainable development. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (pp. 71–73). Tulika Books.
    43. Gualinga, P. (2019). Kawsak Sacha, the Living Forest. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary (pp. 223-226). New Delhi: Tulika Books and AuthorsUpFront.
    44. Gudynas, E. (2010). La senda biocéntrica: Valores intrínsecos, derechos de la naturaleza y justicia ecológica. Tabula Rasa (13), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.404
    45. Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen-vivir: Today's tomorrow. Development, Suppl.Cosmovisions, 54(4), 441-447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
    46. Gudynas, E. (2014). Derechos de la Naturaleza - Éticas biocéntricas y políticas ambientales. Tinta Limon.
    47. Gudynas, E. (2021). Postdevelopment and other critiques of development. In H. Veltmeyer & P. Bowles (Eds.), The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies (pp. 49-56). Routledge
    48. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (T. McCarthy, Trans). Beacon Press.
    49. Hall, S. (2019) [1992]. The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power. In D. Morley (Ed.). Essential Essays Volume 2 – Identity and Diaspora (pp. 185-224). Duke University Press.
    50. Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more: How Degrowth will Save the World. Penguin Random House.
    51. Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., & Cubillo-Guevara, A. (2014). Seis debates abiertos sobre el sumak kawsay. Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 25, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.48.2014.1204
    52. Hobson, J.M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489013
    53. Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2015). Vivir Bien/Buen Vivir. Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias de los pueblos ancestrales. Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas/CAOI.
    54. Hunfeld, K. (2022). The coloniality of time in the global justice debate: de-centring Western linear temporality. Journal of Global Ethics, 18(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2022.2052151
    55. Hutchings, K. (2008). Time and World Politics: Thinking the Present. Manchester University Press.
    56. Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J.M. & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
    57. Inuca Lechón, J.B. (2017). Yachay tinkuy o encuentro y confrontación de saberes: Genealogía de la interculturalidad y del buen vivir en la educación de los pueblos kichwas del Ecuador desde mediados del siglo XX. PhD. thesis in history. FLACSO Ecuador. https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/12808
    58. Kallis, G. (2011). In Defense of Degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70, 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
    59. Kothari, A., Demaria, F. & Acosta, A. (2014). Buen-vivir, Degrowth, and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to Sustainable Development and Green Economy. Development, 57, 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24
    60. Kothari, A., Temper, L., Rodriguez, I., Walter, M., Özkaynak, B., Masri, R., Inturias, M., Martin, A., Turhan, E., Broome, N. P., Bajpai, S., Gobby, J., Pelenc, J., Tatpati, M. & Ajit, S. (2024). Towards a Just Transformations Theory. In I. Rodriguez, M. Walter, & L. Temper (Eds.), Just Transformations: Grassroots Struggles for Alternative Futures (pp. 315-332). Pluto Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/77032
    61. Krenak, A. (2020a). Ideas to postpone the end of the world. (A. Doyle, Trans). House of Anansi Press.
    62. Krenak, A. (2020b). Caminhos para a cultura do bem viver. Cultura do Bem Viver. http://observatorioedhemfoc.hospedagemdesites.ws/observatorio/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Ailton-Krenak.pdf
    63. Krenak, A. (2024). Ancestral Future (A. Brostoff & J. Pinheiro Dias, Trans). Polity Press.
    64. Lalander, R. (2014). Rights of Nature and the Indigenous Peoples in Bolivia and Ecuador: A Straitjacket for Progressive Development Politics? Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo, 3(2), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.137
    65. Lalander, R. & Cuestas-Caza, J. (2017). Sumak Kawsay y Buen-Vivir en Ecuador. In A.D. Verdú Delgado (Ed.), Conocimientos ancestrales y procesos de desarrollo: Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (pp. 30-64). Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja/UTPL.
    66. Lalander, R., Eguiguren Riofrio, M.B., Vera, A.K., Reyes, M., Espinosa, G. & Lembke, M. (2021). Indigenous Gold Mining in the Kenkuim Shuar Community: A Decolonial and Postcapitalist Approach to Sustainability. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 10(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.570
    67. Lalander, R., Fortes, B.S. & Lembke, M. (2025). Sumak Kawsay / Buen-vivir, a Flying River: A Decolonial Approach to Tinkuy and Social Justice. In Galindo, J.F., Gonzales, W., Moser, M. (eds.), Vivir Bien: Diálogos transculturales e interdisciplinarios entre Latinoamérica y Europa. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana Vervuert, 109–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.31819/9783968696973_005
    68. Lalander, R. & Lembke, M. (2020). Interculturality from Below: Territoriality and Floating Indigenous Identities in Plurinational Ecuador. Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales, 9, 129-158. https://www.udla.edu.ec/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/revista-CPRI-2020-final-correctora-digital-2.pdf
    69. Lalander, R. & Merimaa, M. (2018). The Discursive Paradox of Environmental Conflict: Between Ecologism and Economism in Ecuador, Forum for Development Studies, 45(3), 485-511, https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2018.1427622
    70. Lang, M., Bringel, B. & Manahan, M.A. (2024). Lucrative Transitions, Green Colonialism and Pathways to Transformative Eco-social Justice: An Introduction. In M. Lang, M.A. Manahan & B. Bringel (Eds.), The Geopolitics of Green Colonialism: Global Justice and Ecosocial Transitions, (pp. 1-24). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12865310.5
    71. Latouche, S. (2015a). Imaginary, decolonization of. In G. D'Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 146-149). Routledge.
    72. Latouche, S. (2015b). Disaster, pedagogy of. In G. D'Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 122–124). Routledge.
    73. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. (C. Porter, Trans). Harvard University Press.
    74. Lélé, S.M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review, World Development, 19(6): 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
    75. Marengo, J. A., & Souza Junior, C. (2018). Mudanças climáticas: Impactos e cenários para a Amazônia. Alana - APIB (Articulação dos Povos Indígenas do Brasil), Art. 19.https://www.oamanhaehoje.com.br/assets/pdf/Relatorio_Mudancas_Climaticas-Amazonia.pdf
    76. McNelly, A. & Franz, T. (2024). Making and Unmaking the actually Existing Hegemonic Green Transition, The Extractive Industries and Society, 20, art. 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101525
    77. Mignolo, W.D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options, Duke University Press.
    78. Mignolo, W.D. (2021). Sustainable development or sustainable economies? Ideas towards living in harmony and plenitude, International Journal of Societies, Politics and Cultures, 1(1), 49-66. http://www.socioscapes.org/index.php/sc/article/view/33
    79. Mignolo, W.D. & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press.
    80. Mills, C.W. (2014). White Time: The Chronic Injustice of Ideal Theory. Du Bois Review, 11(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X14000022
    81. Mills, C.W. (2020). The Chronopolitics of Racial Time. Time & Society, 29(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20903650
    82. Nourani Rinaldi, P. (2022). The Age of Transition: Postdevelopment and North-South Synergies. Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211060381
    83. Oikonomakis, L. (2024). Protecting the Forest Beings that Protect Us: The Cosmo‐Political Challenge Kawsak Sacha Poses to Ecuador's Extraction‐Based Development. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 43(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13535
    84. Ortiz-T., P. (2024). Del dicho al hecho. Presente y futuro de los derechos indígenas en el Ecuador. In A. Barrera, M.A. Espín, S. Granda Merchán & R. Oetzel (eds.), Diálogos para la paz: Miradas desde la diversidad, Tomo 1 (pp. 51-82). Abya-Yala. https://doi.org/10.17163/abyaups.80.579
    85. (n.d.). ¿Quiénes Somos? Pastaza Kikin Kichwa Runakuna (PAKKIRU). https://pakkiru.org/quienes-somos/
    86. Rifkin, M. (2017). Beyond Settler Time: Temporal Sovereignty and Indigenous Self-Determination. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smrwm
    87. Rist, G. (2007). Development as a buzzword. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 485-491, https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469328
    88. Rodríguez, I., Walter, M., & Temper, L. (2024). In I. Rodriguez, M. Walter & L. Temper (Eds.), Just Transformations: Grassroots Struggles for Alternative Futures (pp. 1-28). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8501592
    89. Rodríguez-Garavito, C. & Baquero-Díaz, C. (2022). Reframing Indigenous rights: The Right to Consultation and the Rights of Nature and Future Generations in the Sarayaku Legal Mobilization. In G. de Búrca (Ed.), Legal Mobilization for Human Rights (pp. 73–88). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192866578.001.0001
    90. Said, E.W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
    91. Sarayaku Governing Council (2018). Kawsak Sacha Declaration. Sarayaku Government Council: Sarayaku, Ecuador.
    92. Sud, N. & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2022). Southern Discomfort: Interrogating the Category of the Global South. Development and Change, 53(6), 1123-1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12742
    93. Svampa, M. (2019). Las fronteras del neoextractivismo en América Latina: Conflictos socioambientales, giro ecoterritorial y nuevas dependencias. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2f9xs4v
    94. Thompson, E.P. (1967). Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Past & Present, 38, 56-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/38.1.56
    95. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
    96. Uzendoski, M. (2014). Analogic Alterity: The Dialogics of Life of Amazonian Kichwa Mythology in Comparison with Tupi Guaraní (Mbyá) Creation Stories. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 12(1): 28-47. https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol12/iss1/3
    97. Vanhulst, J. & Beling, A.E. (2014). Buen vivir: ¿Emergent discourse within or beyondsustainable development? Ecological Economics, 101, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.017
    98. Viteri Gualinga, C. (2003). Sumak Kausai: Una respuesta viable al desarrollo. B.A. thesis in applied anthropology. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Quito).
    99. Viteri Gualinga, A. (2004). Tierra y territorio como derechos. Pueblos. Revista de Información y Debate, 14, 30-31. Retrieved from http://www.revistapueblos.org/old/spip.php?article75
    100. World Bank. (2020). Minerals for Climate Action: The Mineral Intensity of the Clean Energy Transition. Retrieved from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/961711588875536384/Minerals-for-Climate-Action-The-Mineral-Intensity-of-the-Clean-Energy-Transition.pdf
    101. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
    102. Yampara Huarachi, S. (2011). Cosmovivencia Andina. Vivir y convivir en armonía integral. Bolivian Studies Journal, 18: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5195/bsj.2011.42
    103. Yampara Huarachi, S. (2016). Suma Qama Qamaña. Paradigma Cosmo-biótico Tiwanakuta. Crítica al sistema mercantil kapitalista. Ediciones Qamañ Pacha.
    104. Yanez, I. & Moreno, C. (2024). Accumulation and Dispossession by Decarbonisation. In M. Lang, M. A. Manahan, & B. Bringel (Eds.), The Geopolitics of Green Colonialism: Global Justice and Ecosocial Transitions (pp. 76–88). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12865310.10
    105. Ziai, A. (2015). Development Discourse and Global History: From Colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753782

Referencias

Portada

Descargas

Publicado

2025-05-19

Número

No. 5 (2025): Revista Dialógica Intercultural

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Dialógica Intercultural

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Política de Acceso Abierto para la revista Dialógica Intercultural
Los autores que publican en este medio están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:

Esta revista provee acceso libre bajo  licencia Creative Commons  Reconocimiento-NoComercial CC BY - NC. Los/las autores (as) conservan su derecho de autoría. Esta licencia permite que otros utilicen, remezclen, adapten y desarrollen su trabajo sin fines comerciales, siempre y cuando lo/la citen y licencien sus publicaciones bajo los mismos términos: 

  1. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución, no exclusiva, de la versión de la obra publicada en esta revista (situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con el reconocimiento de la publicación original en Dialógica Intercultural.

    2. Los autores podrán difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente como: en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web, antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una circulación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Revisar The Effect of Open Access, en inglés).

Cómo citar

Laprevote, N. ., Fortes, B. S. ., & Lalander, R. . (2025). Rethinking Transition through Temporalities: Discursive Alternatives for Crafting Sustainable Futures. Revista Dialógica Intercultural, 5, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15373790

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a